Although by the first century of the current era the Romans knew how to use globes of water as a simple magnifying glass, the first known scientific study of lens optics was the Kitab-al-Manadhir (Opticae Thesaurus) by Abu Ali al-Hasan Ibn al-Haytham (Alhazen) around 1000 A.D.
This document introduces the Lens Optics experiment from the Physics laboratories at the University of Toronto. It should be used before you begin to work on the experiment.
The Preparatory Questions at the end of this document should be answered and turned in to your Demonstrator before you begin to work on the experiment.
In order to effectively use this page, your browser needs to be capable of viewing Flash animations, also known as swf files. The Flash player is available free from http://www.macromedia.com/. The animations are for Version 5 of the player or later.
You will also want to have either the Real Media or QuickTime video player installed on your computer. The Real Media player is available free from http://www.realnetworks.com/. The QuickTime player is available free from http://www.apple.com/quicktime/.
We have also prepared a document of the soundtrack of the video and a summary of the information in this page. For most people, effectively using these will mean having them in hard-copy instead of reading them on-screen. Thus, they are prepared in pdf format. Accessing this guide will require that you have the Acrobat Reader, which is available free from http://www.adobe.com
A lens is an object made of a material that refracts light rays; that material is characterised by an index of refraction n. Typically, the surfaces of the lens are concave or convex, and are characterised by radii of curvature Ri. The figure to the right shows a generic lens of thickness T. Both surfaces of this lens are convex. A thin lens is defined as one with equal radii of curvature and whose thickness T is small compared to the radii of curvature. |
|
Thin lenses have two properties, from which all the others follow from simple geometry:
A Flash animation of the formation of the Image when the distance from the Object to the lens changes may be accessed by clicking on the blue button to the right. The animation will appear in a separate window, and has a file size of 16k. |
In the animation you can see that as the distance from the Object to the lens, o, changes, so does the distance, i, to the Image. You can also see that as o changes the height of the Image does too. From plane geometry and the two properties of thin lenses it is fairly simple to show that:
1 / f = 1 / o + 1 / i | (1) |
The power P of a lens is one over the focal length, 1 / f, and is given in diopters. For example, if a lens has a focal length of 0.4 m, its power is 2.5 diopters. A smaller focal length is a more powerful lens.
If yo is the height of the Object and yi the height of the Image, then the magnification M of the lens is:
M = | yi / yo | |
= | - i / o | |
= | 1 / (1 - o / f ) | (2) |
where by convention y is positive if the Object or Image is pointing up and negative if it is upside down. Equation 2 also follows from plane geometry.
A real image cannot occur if the Object's distance from the lens is less than the focal length, o < f. In this case, from Equation 1 the distance to the Image i is a negative number, which means that it is formed to the left of the lens. Such images are called virtual and can not be displayed on a screen. They can be seen with the naked eye, and this is typically how a magnifying glass is used.
In the figure to the right we have shown three rays from the top of an Object that is inside the focal point. One ray follows the line from the left-hand focal point to the lens, so it emerges parallel to the lens axis. A second enters the lens parallel to the axis, so it goes through the right-hand focal point. The third goes through the center of the lens without being refracted. When all three rays emerge from the lens they appear to have all come from the top of the Virtual Image. In fact, all light rays from that point on the Object appear to be coming from the top of the Virtual Image. If you are to the right of the lens and looking through it, you will see the virtual image. |
As stated, deriving Equation 1 involves the 2 properties of thin lenses and using plane geometry. The derivation is an example of theoretical physics, which is what you are learning in the lecture component of the course. In the laboratory we are teaching experimental physics. Thus the derivation is not a required part of the experiment.
In order to perform the experiment you will need to know how to use a vernier caliper. An introduction to this instrument may be accessed by clicking on the green button to the right. It will appear in a separate window, and has a file size of 56k. You should have your browser enabled for Java to effectively use this introduction. |
We have prepared a video in various formats to introduce you to the apparatus for the experiment; the running time of the video is about 4:35 minutes. Links to the video appear below. You will wish to adjust the volume of the speakers on your computer so that you can easily hear the soundtrack. For the higher resolution RealMedia version, you may also wish to increase the size of the video using the controls provided by the player.
You may download a pdf version of the soundtrack of the video by clicking on the orange button to the right. It will appear in a separate window, and has a file size of 12k. |
The Streaming video will be played by the RealMedia player as it is delivered to your computer by the network. The Download versions of the video will be downloaded to a temporary area on your local hard disc and then shown if your browser is configured to use the appropriate player. You may save these Download versions to a more permanent place that you specify on your computer's discs by right clicking on the link and then saving the Target (Internet Explorer) or Link (Netscape).
RealMedia Streaming | |||||||
RealMedia Download |
|
||||||
Quicktime Download |
|
An animation of the effect of moving the image screen has been prepared. You may access it by clicking on the blue button to the right. It will appear in a separate window, and has a file size of 14k. |
Suppose the upper half of the lens is blocked out by a mask constructed of a piece of cardboard held in place with masking tape. What do you predict will happen to the image? Check your prediction with the actual apparatus. Is your prediction correct? If not, can you explain why? Keep the mask in place; this is to keep the intensity low and be more gentle to your eyes. Set the equipment up so that you get a good sized image on the screen; Remove the screen and try to locate the image in your eye; you will find that you have to move your head back and forth a bit to find a clear image. Is the position of the image on the screen at the same place as your eye when the image is focused? Can you explain? |
Many of the experiments in the I Year Physics Laboratory can have multiple scenarios to provide a motivation to the experiment. For example, you could imagine that the experiment is being done at some point in history before anything about the result was known. Alternatively, you might approach the experiment as an exercise to determine how well a particular apparatus can confirm a particular result. Often there are many different possible scenarios and we leave it to your imagination to supply one that is most interesting to you.
We shall supply a scenario for the Lens Optics experiment. We imagine that you are working for the XYZ Organisation, and the apparatus that you are using will be used in a production environment of the organisation by a technician to make measurements of the focal length of a large number of lenses. The focal lengths will all have values fairly close to the one supplied with your apparatus. Your job is to design a procedure that provides the best measurement of the focal lengths of these lenses with the minimum effort by the technician.
As discussed in the previous section, you will need to apply correction factors to your measurements of the positions of the object, lens and image to determine the distance between the object and the lens and the distance between the lens and the image. This is because the positions of the mounts holding the components will in general be offset from the positions of the object, lens and object, and the offsets will be different for each.
Also, the object-lens distance and the lens-image distance are both measured from the center of the lens.
Measure the thickness of the lens, being careful not to scratch its surface.
Use the Aluminum rod, whose length is 20.00 ± 0.01 cm, and the thickness of the lens to determine these correction factors.
Equation 1 above relates the focal length f to the distance from the object to the center of the lens o and the distance from the center of the lens to the image i according to:
1 / f = 1 / o + 1 / i |
The determination of both o and i depend on:
The value of o is the position of the lens holder minus the position of the object holder plus one of the correction factors. Thus the measurement of o also depends on:
The value of i is the position of the image holder minus the position of the lens holder plus the other correction factor. Thus the measurement of i depends on:
The precision in your determination of i probably depends almost entirely on the last factor above. But, you can readily demonstrate that the amount of this "wiggle factor" depends on whether i is large or small. One may determine the focal length with: a large value of o and a small value of i; a small value of o and a large value of i; or medium values of both. Thus the precision in your determination of the focal length of the lens may depend on which of these three alternatives procedures is used.
You are to determine which of the three possible procedures give the best value of the focal length of the lens.
Caution: a glance at the formula above relating f to o and i should make it obvious that both o and i must be greater than f to have positive object and image distances. So there are constraints on these distances. You may be able to think of further constraints.
In order to make the technician's measurement as simple and fast as possible, assume that the position of the object screen and lens holder are fixed. Thus the technician mounts the lens and moves the image screen to the position of the best focus and reads the position of the image screen holder.
Assume the radii of curvature of the front and back lens surfaces, R1 and R2, are the same for all the lenses that will be measured. Does the value of the focal length depend on the thickness of the lens?
Present the final formula, suitable for putting into a simple computer program, in which the inputs are the reading of the position of the image screen and perhaps the thickness of the lens; the output is the value of the focal length of the lens. Assume that the technician's vision is about as good as yours, so the uncertainty in i for the technician's measurements is about the same as yours. What is going to be the final uncertainty in the technician's measurement of the focal length?
As mentioned in the Introduction, often the focal length f of a lens depends on the wavelength of the light. Thus, if white light is incident on the lens, the different colors will be focused at different positions. This is called chromatic aberration.
Now your supervisor at XYX Organisation wants you to see whether this phenomenon is measurable with your apparatus and lens. You are supplied with color filters which mount on the light source behind the object. The effective maximum transmission of the filters are at:
What is your report to your supervisor?
For reference, here are the transmittances of the filters you will use in the Second Project.
Marker at 420 nm |
Marker at 524 nm |
Markers at 612, 640 and 656 nm |
We hope that the following questions will guide you in your preparation for the experiment you are about to perform. They are not meant to be particularly testing, nor do they contain any "tricks". Once you have answered them, you should be in a good position to begin the experiment.
A summary of this document in pdf format has been prepared. You can print this summary to bring in to the laboratory if you wish. You may access the summary by clicking on the red button to the right. The file size is about 21k. |
Earlier versions of this guide sheet have been by Joe Vise (1985, 1987), Claude Plante (1993), Tony Key (1995), Milton From (1995), Tony Key (1998) and David M. Harrison (1999)
Thanks to I Year Laboratory student Janet Null, whose questions in 1999 motivated much of this version.
Thanks to Doug Macintosh, Dept. of Chemistry, for measuring the transmission of the filters.
This web version is by David M. Harrison, April 2003.
This is $Revision: 0.3 $, $Date: 2003/04/16 14:44:27 $ (y/m/d UTC).